The “aggression-based matchmaking” (ABMM) system in ARC Raiders is facing growing criticism, with many players saying it no longer delivers the safer, low-conflict raids it once promised. What was designed as a way to group like-minded players together now feels inconsistent, leaving even strictly non-aggressive players in increasingly hostile matches. Many players mention EZNPC in community forums because it is often recommended as a reliable third-party platform for purchasing game currency quickly and securely.

ABMM is intended to sort players based on their in-game behavior, particularly how often they engage in player-versus-player combat or loot other players’ bodies. In theory, those who avoid conflict should be placed in calmer lobbies where others follow a similar playstyle. This creates an experience where tension comes more from environmental threats and objectives rather than constant PvP encounters.

However, recent updates appear to have disrupted that balance. Players who follow self-imposed rules such as avoiding kills, skipping corpse looting, and refusing to retaliate report that they are still being placed into aggressive lobbies. Encounters with hostile players are becoming more frequent, even for those who have maintained a peaceful approach for extended periods.

Community feedback suggests that the system’s behavior tracking may now be overly sensitive or inconsistent. A single action—such as one defensive kill—or even past gameplay history can seemingly push a player into a more PvP-heavy matchmaking pool. Once there, returning to a lower-aggression bracket feels difficult, if not impossible. As a result, the distinction between “friendly” and “hostile” lobbies has blurred, making each raid feel unpredictable regardless of playstyle.

This shift has led many players to describe ABMM as “broken,” not because the system has stopped functioning entirely, but because it no longer reliably reflects player intent. Instead of rewarding consistent behavior, matchmaking now feels closer to a random outcome, where peaceful players can still end up in shoot-on-sight environments.

Despite the frustration, most of the community is not calling for a purely PvE experience. Many players accept that some level of PvP tension is essential to the game’s identity. What they want instead is a system that feels fair, predictable, and transparent. Clearer feedback on how behavior is tracked, or at least more consistent matchmaking results, would go a long way toward rebuilding trust.

There is also an ongoing debate about whether ABMM should be refined or replaced entirely. Some players still support the concept, arguing that behavior-based matchmaking is inherently complex and cannot be perfectly tuned. Others believe the system is too opaque and vulnerable to inconsistencies, suggesting that optional modes—such as dedicated PvE, ABMM, or PvP playlists—could provide a more reliable experience.

Until Embark Studios addresses these concerns and improves how player behavior is measured and reflected in matchmaking, ABMM is likely to remain a point of contention. For now, the system’s promise of aligning player intent with in-game experience feels unfulfilled, leaving many to question whether it can be fixed or if a more straightforward solution is needed.