Rachel Reeves has suggested she favours removing limits on benefits linked to family size at next month's Budget.

The chancellor told the BBC it was not right that children in bigger families were "penalised" through "no fault of their own".

The comments are a sign she could remove the two-child limit on working-age benefits introduced under the Conservatives in 2017.

Some Labour MPs have been calling for a full reversal of the policy, amid reports she was considering paring back payments after two children instead.

In September, the Guardian reported that Treasury officials were considering a tapered approach, under which parents would receive most benefits for their first child and less for subsequent children.

Other options under consideration included limiting additional benefits to three or four children, the newspaper reported.

But speaking to Matt Chorley on BBC Radio 5 Live, Reeves suggested she did not want to see benefits limited according to family size.

"I don't think that it's right that a child is penalised because they are in a bigger family, through no fault of their own," she added.

"And so we will take action on child poverty. The last Labour government proudly reduced child poverty, and we will reduce child poverty as well."

Elsewhere in her interview, she all but confirmed the government plans to break Labour's manifesto pledge at last year's general election not to raise income tax rates, VAT or National Insurance.

"It would of course be possible to stick with the manifesto commitments. But that would require things like deep cuts in capital spending," she added.

"What I promised during the election campaign was to bring stability back to our economy.

"What I can promise now is I will always do what I think is right for our country. Not the politically easy choice, but the things that I think are necessary to put our country on the right path".

The two-child cap prevents households on universal or child tax credit from receiving payments for a third or subsequent child born after April 2017.

The Resolution Foundation think tank says axing the policy would cost £3.5bn and would lift 470,000 children out of poverty.

Sir Keir Starmer has previously spoken of his desire to ditch the cap when economic conditions allow, without specifying exact circumstances.

Pressure to ditch the limit increased during the recent Labour deputy leadership contest, where successful candidate Lucy Powell and runner-up Bridget Phillipson both indicated they favoured more action on child poverty.

Reform UK has also pledged to scrap the limit if it wins power, although the Conservatives have getting rid of it is not "economically credible".